Last Chance to Ride: A Week With the UCI World Cycling Centre

Content retiring December 31, 2025

Hi everyone,

We’re posting this update to let you know that the “A Week With the UCI World Cycling Centre” series will be removed from SYSTM after December 31, 2025.

This content was originally released as part of a special collaboration with the UCI World Cycling Centre. The licensing agreement for this series is expiring, and we will no longer be able to host the workouts or video content beyond the date above.

If you want to ride the series and earn your badge, now’s the time!

All workouts in the series will remain fully available until December 31, 2025.
After that, they will no longer appear in the SYSTM library but the badge will be visible to you if you have earnt it.

:folded_hands: Thank You

A big thank-you to everyone who has ridden, and supported this week with series. And of course, huge appreciation to the UCI World Cycling Centre for making the series possible.

:woman_biking: :man_biking: :dashing_away:

7 Likes

Dang!

That MTB session is one of my favourites. Also the BMX.

Such great Climb integration!

:cry:

7 Likes

Ah, really liked that series!

2 Likes

Sad news. This was by far my favourite AWW.

3 Likes

This is a real shame. The road and mtb sessions are ones I use fairly regularly and really enjoy. This on top of the tour going, all after subscription fees were increased. Dame @Helga are we getting some more content to replace them, otherwise we are very much being charged more for less?

6 Likes

Thanks for the heads up. That’s the one “Week with” series I repeat, especially the BMX. I’ll have to fit it into my December plan!

2 Likes

Very unfortunate. The mountain bike one is on my favorites list. Would be great to get more mountain bike videos. I’m sorry to see this one go.

3 Likes

That’s a real shame….this was a really enjoyable set of workouts. I would hope to see some new content from Wahoo in the near future: and I’m not talking about yet more On Location or infomercials.

The content has become quite stale and looking at the unaltered SUF videos (with the music, great storylines, etc) makes me very nostalgic.

It really does feel (rightly or wrongly) that SYSTM is not that a high a priority for Wahoo.

6 Likes

Thanks for the feedback, we are working on the content release plan for 2026.

We do plan to create a new video for the BMX workout as it is unique to our library.

For the MTB session we have other 2x20min workouts such as:

  • Hell Hath No Fury
  • Clobber (first 2 intervals)

However the plan is not finalized and we will look for opportunities to recreate the mountain biking race.

5 Likes

MTB is brilliant - the aggression in the mens race really helps you through the second set when you are hurting!

1 Like

I really really like the On Location videos, so please give us more of those :winking_face_with_tongue: But yes, please give us more Sufferfest and other content, too :grin: If Wahoo want to combine On Location and A Week With, “A Week with Mike Cotty” would be a great idea! It would be exciting to accompany Mike for a week and see for example how he shoots his videos.

4 Likes

Gosh, this highlights how complicated all this licensing business is :cry:

I really liked the MTB and Road sessions; I’ll try to fit them in again before they disappear.

But some off road suffering highlighting the utility of the climb / bike gradient would make a nice change from road-based punishment!

Thanks, and sorry to see it go.

2 Likes

One of the things I enjoyed about that series was learning about the different types of cycling and how that affected training. I’d love to see that concept repeated in a new series.

2 Likes

@Helga and @Rupert

Yes, I’m still lurking on occasion, after having written off Wahoo X SYSTM etc for multiple reasons, not least of which was exactly what this change indicates about the directions being taken by Wahoo for the app (by whatever name.)

As soon as I saw the thread title, my IMMEDIATE thought was, “NOOO! NOT THE MTB RACE!!!” And CLEARLY it is high on the list of regrets by posters here!

But as others have said, that whole series had a distinct appeal, engaging several disciplines in one series, revealing some aspects most of us would have no exposure to even have a clue what some of these young racers do in training, and there’s much more.

For me, the MTB race was UNFORGETTABLE ON THE KICKR BIKE! For some, it might even be thought of negatively but I LAUGHED OUT LOUD at myself when the KICKR BIKE NEARLY THREW ME OFF THE SADDLE on some of the very sudden and extreme gradient changes!! It was SO FAST and SO DIFFERENT from any other ride that I have kept that MTB Race in the back of my mind ever since. Anytime I want to experience the FULL MEASURE of what the KICKR BIKE CAN DO, I knew I could ride that one again.

And as others have said, that race was SO ENGAGING, SO GRIPPING, SO INTENSE, that unless you just withdraw in defeat, you MUST MAX OUT your effort and GO FOR IT! The loss of that workout is HUGE to Wahoo! And so it is true for the rest of that WEEK WITH series workouts.

I have been using ROUVY for over a month, taking advantage of a 50% off price for 2 months with them, reevaluating that app, deciding if a silent app can even hope to keep my engaged (that’s a significant question mark!), and appreciating the actual video of actual places in the world I’ll never visit but can ride virtually anyway! (That’s a BIG PLUS for ROUVY.)

But frankly, as @sir_james.p has said,

Here is my question to Wahoo: Does it make more BUSINESS SENSE to continue to REDUCE YOUR CONTENT to save (how little??) money, while in the process ALIENATING, AGGRAVATING, and LOSING CUSTOMERS, or is it just barely possible that you need to work out BETTER CONTRACTS IN THE FIRST PLACE, i.e. specific agreements that allow ongoing use of the content for as long as the app exists, at agreed-upon pricing.

This is just ludicrous in my opinion that Wahoo has EVER had to surrender ANY OF THESE WORKOUTS! Your user base is varied and you cannot be certain which workouts will become favorites, but you can expect support from at least some of your base for any that are well designed and well produced.

So when you REMOVE CONTENT, you should EXPECT DISSATISFACTION, and in my humble opinion, you should expect MORE DISSATISFACTION from REMOVING CONTENT than you can gain from ADDING CONTENT, EVEN THOUGH ADDING IS IMPORTANT, even CRITICAL! But for the last year, it seems that CONTENT REMOVAL has been at the top of the list of changes to the app! AND YOU HAVE HEARD THE GRUMBLING!

Sure, you’ve added workouts. Kudos for that. Small kudos. Because the additions have been pushed to the dimly lit side of the stage by the glaring losses that are up front and center!

I’ve read of some satisfaction that one or two of the most recently RE-RE-REMASTERED workouts are FINALLY catching SOME of the spirit of their ORIGINAL EXCELLENT CHARACTER. I AM ENCOURAGED at that, and IT DOES MATTER! I wouldn’t continue to lurk here at all if I hadn’t seen any glimmer of hope. It’s dim for sure, and the subject of this thread threatens to snuff the smoldering wick…

For WHOEVER is actually BEHIND THESE LOSSES, here are some blatantly OBVIOUS QUESTIONS:

WAS IT WORTH ALL THIS LOSS??

WAS IT IMPOSSIBLE TO WORK OUT NEW TERMS OF AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN AWESOME CONTENT??

DOES IT MAKE MORE SENSE TO TRASH THIS ALREADY EXISTING “WEEK WITH UCI” ONLY TO (IF THIS EVEN HAPPENS) DEVELOP A REPLACEMENT, WITH NEW PRODUCTION COSTS AND UNCERTAIN QUALITY AND APPEAL?

IF I MYSELF (and I’m not naive enough to think I’m fit for the task, nor would I desire the responsibility) were suddenly thrust into the position of directing the future of Wahoo X, SYSTM, (WHATEVER), I know that my very first order would be to task the appropriate personnel to WORK OUT AGREEMENTS TO RETAIN EXISTING CONTENT for ANY that does not have ongoing access at agreed upon rates. It well may be that your previous agreements were ill-conceived and too expensive to continue, especially if your user base has declined (wonder why that is?), but you clearly have NOT RETAINED THE QUALITY OF PERSONNEL that can PRODUCE EQUAL OR BETTER CONTENT to offset the losses.

And if the “old” content is BETTER than what you’re prepared to offer in its stead, yet you still choose to remove it, you WILL NOT GAIN CUSTOMERS by RAISING RATES. YOU CAN ONLY LOSE MORE!

(I’m proof of this; I MIGHT still return were the pricing tolerable but it is NOT. And I’m CERTAINLY NOT PAYING FOR ANNUAL with the OBVIOUS DECLINE OF THE APP, so the MONTHLY COST IS JUST PROHIBITIVE. As good as SYSTM IS (WAS?), I still ride outdoors whenever I can, so there must be a more flexible policy if I’m to support it. While ROUVY rates are now as high as SYSTM, they offer several ways to save, including the 50% offer they’ve given me a couple times, and DUAL and GROUP rates that are much better, plus a PAUSE FOR UP TO 6MONTHS feature. I will do exactly that, with a friend(s) if I indeed am willing to commit to ROUVY long-term.)

I’m TRULY HOPING that SYSTM will not only SURVIVE, but also THRIVE AND REGAIN DIRECTION before it is swallowed up by the competition. I hope all the feedback that has been received on this forum IS HEEDED before it is too late. THERE IS NO OTHER APP OF ITS KIND, and its STRENGTH IS ITS UNIQUENESS, which sadly is being WATERED DOWN BY IGNORANCE of that UNIQUE VALUE.

One last thought… I am not convinced in the least that the operating costs of offering SYSTM exceeds the operating costs of some competitors like ROUVY OR ZWIFT. Since I hate ZWIFT, I’ll avoid commenting on costs to produce and present content, but ROUVY offers an always growing list of routes all over the world, an also growing and effective list of workouts which I have used to good purpose, some training plans which I do not use with any app anyway but which might be better with ROUVY because ROUVY does import one’s outdoor activities, a long-requested but never offered feature from SYSTM.

1 Like

Is there any plans for more ‘A week with’ series? There hasn’t bene a new one in ages and given the number of pro teams using Wahoo’s products or being directly sponsored by them, there’s surely lots of room for such content. Would like more of them.

7 Likes

@Rupert @Helga

I really enjoyed this series and sorry to see it go, thank you for explaining why, what will happen, and giving me other options. This really helps so wherever you can, please continue to give an explanation for decisions, although I still don’t like the change, for me, it helps a lot :+1::slightly_smiling_face::woman_biking:

1 Like

HHNF and Clobber aren’t really anything like the MTB race, it’s MAP focused, they are threshold efforts, albeit HHNF surges a lot, but still threshold is the focus. The road race is a loss too, as there isn’t much in the library at that duration and intensity.

I have to say, I get licensing issues with ASO footage, but this seems odd, it’s not like the UCI will sell this to anyone else.

4 Likes

I was gonna say sumfin like that. HHNF is a modified 2x20 threshold workout. The MTB race is very different. It’s also, for Climb or Bike (v1,v2 or Pro) users, one of the most engaging rides in the library.

2 Likes

@DouthatBiker If you are going to rant at least keep it concise.

It is a silly argument that Wahoo would willingly pull workouts that it has invested time and money to produce.

Take a look at what is happening at other streaming companies - the cost of content delivery is going up. Sure Wahoo competes with other training platforms but it is the only one that licenses race footage for its workouts.

David McQuillen started Sufferfest over a decade ago using a unique licensing approach that focused on paying for snippets of content to get the business off the ground. Clearly that isn’t working anymore.

3 Likes