I’m brand new to SUF, and fairly new (without the brand) to cycling in general.
I did my very first FF just yesterday, after I gave myself a good week to get used to the trainer, the SW and indoor riding. As for the results, I have two questions:
I screwed up the 5 min effort. Plain and simple. I wasn’t sandbagging really, but when you come into this test with close to zero experience, it’s really hard to pace yourself correctly. Frankly, also the advice that’s given in the “How to get the most out of FF” only helps so much. It refers to how I should feel 2.5 min into the test. Which I will only know 2.5 min into the test Let’s face it, I underperformed, whichever the reasons. Another point is, I did not feel properly warmed up. Perhaps that is because the artificial power metrics the App assigned to me during on boarding were way too low, or I simply need more time (I’m an old man after all).
All this resulted in me being 2 minutes into the 20 min effort, riding marginally below my 5 min result and thinking, boy, I think I could do etter if I simply did the 5 min again right now…
The following efforts were much easier to pace for me. 20 min gave me the time to settle in and adjust after a few minutes, with enough time left of the clock. I’m an experienced 5k and 10k runner, so 20 min all out efforts feel like my living room. I think I got veeery close to my max. I nailed the 1 min too, I’m pretty sure.
The app of course gave me a warning flag, telling me I had not even achieved 115% of my FTP during the 5 min.
So how should I deal with this? I don’t feel experienced enough to manually play with the numbers. But I also don’t want to build my entire training around a MAP weakness that isn’t real. I haven’t planned to redo FF within a week or so. I mean, I could, but… seriously? What I could do is repeating the warm up and the 5 min, but I’m not sure how good an idea that is. A better 5 min effort might have had an impact on the rest of the test as well, simply raising my MAP result might also leave me with artificially high FTP and AC numbers.
I’m a bit clueless here. Any good advice?
Being an experienced runner, my LTHR of 168 seems very low. When I run, my threshold is in the high 170s. Just recently did another Conconi. I finished my most recent marathon 2017 with 176 bpm average. Yes, I know, that sounds like I was 16. Trust me, I’m not…
That said, I do understand that LTHR in running and cycling are not necessarily the same. For me, when on a bike, my effort feels a lot more “localised” in my legs compared to when I’m running. So I can imagine that these specific muscles already produce a lot of lactate while the rest of my body is still asleep.
Frankly, as a bike noob, I find myself quite frequently with legs burning, definitely going anaerobic, while my HR sits somewhere around resting values. This feeling usually sets in when I get closer to my bike than 10 meters
I definitely got better (i.e. legs felt better, HR got more responsive and came up to higher numbers) when I had done some 1000 km during the summer. Now after 3 months off the bike I’m back to square one.
Any comments on this? Is this normal behaviour for people who are new to cycling but have quite some endurance background?
Should I go with the 168 LTHR and trust the app here?
A lot of text, sorry for that. And thanks for reading to everyone who made it to here!